🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold move to prohibit social media access for young people below 16 is sending ripples internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and parents are monitoring with great interest to see if this strategy will set a precedent for other nations.

The European Trend

Across Europe, a growing chorus of nations are exploring comparable measures.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM arguing that mobile devices and platforms are "stealing our children's innocence". Legislation may be passed next year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to shield the young from the "influence of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is developing a online verification tool to authenticate the identity and age of social media account holders. Authorities have suggested that an Australia-style ban could be "a potential options in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has urged parliament to pass a proposal increasing the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has recommended a related step, including an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Netherlands has recommended families to restrict their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a advisory statement supporting a ban for under-16s except if guardian approval is given. Even though it highlights of the "compulsive" nature of these apps, the step does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A strong age restriction is a useful first step," said the parliamentarian supporting the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Approach

For the United Kingdom, the government has kept open a potential ban, arguing that "no measure is being dismissed" but stressing any action must be "based on conclusive data".

Earlier, interest built behind a legislative effort to introduce limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. Instead, the government vowed to further research the issue.

Advocacy groups have raised apprehensions. An organization set up by the loved ones of a girl who died after being exposed to harmful social media material argues that a simple age ban may not make platforms safer and could create a "dangerous transition" of risk when users reach the legal age.

"This ban is a answer to the inability of the tech sector to design products and services that are secure and suitable for minors," stated a prominent child protection advocate.

The United States: A Decentralized Approach

Across America, legislation is primarily occurring at the local government level amid national gridlock.

• The state of Utah mandates parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has signed a measure barring children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has passed a rule restricting teenagers to one hour of social media access per day, with extra use needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise passed laws requiring adult authorization for minors to set up social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and calls from some individuals to mimic Australia's example, a US-wide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Global Views

Outside of the West, additional countries are also taking action.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, international bodies take a more nuanced tone. The UN children's agency has advised that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "may even have unintended consequences". The agency points out that the internet can be a "critical link" for marginalized youth and that bans should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to invest in user protection.

Even as this international conversation evolves, the actions of this nation and its followers demonstrate that states internationally are less and less prepared to delay for tech companies to self-regulate.